Ace A Level Psychology OCR 2026 – Unlock Your Mind Power!

Session length

1 / 900

What is one reason people argue that Milgram's obedience study was not a true experiment?

It lacked a control group

There was no independent variable

One reason people argue that Milgram's obedience study was not a true experiment is the absence of a clearly defined independent variable. In a true experiment, researchers manipulate an independent variable and observe the effects on a dependent variable. However, in Milgram's study, the level of obedience was measured based on participants' responses to authority figures in a specific context rather than through manipulation of a straightforward independent variable. The experimental setup focused on how different conditions (such as proximity to the learner and authority figure) influenced obedience levels, but these conditions did not constitute a clear manipulation of a single independent variable, which is a hallmark of a true experimental design.

In contrast, the presence of a control group and deception played roles in the study's design and ethical considerations; however, they do not directly affect whether the study qualifies as a true experiment. Participants were indeed misled about the nature of the experiment to some extent, but this was a method to ensure realistic behavior and not a measure of experimental validity.

Get further explanation with Examzify DeepDiveBeta

Participants were not properly informed

It did not involve deception

Next Question
Subscribe

Get the latest from Examzify

You can unsubscribe at any time. Read our privacy policy